N100 vs Core i3-8145U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.2 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.2 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
806eb
Core
Alder Lake-N
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
34.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
75.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
17.78k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
12.8k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
2.61k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
1.3k (x0.26)
TOTAL
36.79k
34.48k (x0.94)
Multithread
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
28.06k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
34.83k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
9.69k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
2.55k (x0.66)
TOTAL
88.29k
75.13k (x0.85)
Performance/W
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
2322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
5008 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
4558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
3281 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
669 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
332 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
8840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4