N100 vs Core i3-8130U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
806ea
Core
Alder Lake-N
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
88.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
21.09k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
19.41k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
4.05k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
2.8k (x0.56)
TOTAL
36.79k
47.35k (x1.29)
Multithread
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
38.23k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
38.89k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
8.75k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
2.47k (x0.63)
TOTAL
88.29k
88.35k (x1)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
5890 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4