N100 vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 4.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 4.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
800f82
Core
Alder Lake-N
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
6 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
431.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
15.34k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
25.75k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
5.79k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
17.95k (x3.61)
TOTAL
36.79k
64.83k (x1.76)
Multithread
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
123.07k (x3.32)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
239.3k (x7.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
60.6k (x4.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
8.18k (x2.1)
TOTAL
88.29k
431.14k (x4.88)
Performance/W
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4