N100 vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
a50f00
Core
Alder Lake-N
Cezanne
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
6 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
14.34k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
17.67k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
6.41k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
14.95k (x3)
TOTAL
36.79k
53.37k (x1.45)
Multithread
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
83.58k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
119.22k (x3.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
48.56k (x3.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
3.83k (x0.98)
TOTAL
88.29k
255.19k (x2.89)
Performance/W
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4