N100 vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-N
Picasso
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
140.97k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
10.88k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
18.09k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
4.29k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
3.36k (x0.68)
TOTAL
36.79k
36.64k (x1)
Multithread
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
42.44k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
73.82k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
20.76k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
3.96k (x1.02)
TOTAL
88.29k
140.97k (x1.6)
Performance/W
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
9398 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4