N100 vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.4 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.4 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-N
Picasso
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
11.13k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
19.38k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
4.47k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
3.87k (x0.78)
TOTAL
36.79k
38.85k (x1.06)
Multithread
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
17.13k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
30.56k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
9.44k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
4.09k (x1.05)
TOTAL
88.29k
61.23k (x0.69)
Performance/W
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4