N100 vs Core i7-11700F
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 5.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 5.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
a0671
Core
Alder Lake-N
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
32.55k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
26.95k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
10.76k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
19.32k (x3.88)
TOTAL
36.79k
89.58k (x2.43)
Multithread
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
232.06k (x6.26)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
203.56k (x6.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
72.89k (x4.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
3.81k (x0.98)
TOTAL
88.29k
512.32k (x5.8)
Performance/W
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4