Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Virtual CPU 2,84GHz
Description
The Q9550 is based on Core architecture while the 2,84GHz is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 1.6 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 1.6 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
f4a
Core
Yorkfield
-
Base frecuency
2.833 GHz
2.84 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
95 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
- kB
Cache L2
12288 kB
- kB
Cache L3
0 kB
- kB
Date
March 2008
-
Mean monothread perf.
17.29k points
21.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.98k points
79.76k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q9550
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
3.28k
4.27k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
8.93k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
2.79k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
5.23k (x1.34)
TOTAL
17.29k
21.22k (x1.23)
Multithread
Q9550
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
11.72k
19.35k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
24.91k
40.57k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.77k
13.15k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
6.7k (x2.6)
TOTAL
48.98k
79.76k (x1.63)
Performance/W
Q9550
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
123 points/W