Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Xeon E5506
Description
The Q9550 is based on Core architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 1.8 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 1.8 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
106a5
Core
Yorkfield
Gainestown
Base frecuency
2.833 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
95 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
12288 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2008
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.29k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.98k points
90.45k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Q9550
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
1.21k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
2.75k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
1.94k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.43k
0.78k (x0.18)
TOTAL
16.42k
6.68k (x0.41)
Multithread
Q9550
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
9.92k
12.25k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
25.55k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.31k
17.1k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
5.01k (x1.49)
TOTAL
48.96k
59.9k (x1.22)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q9550
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3.28k
4.48k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
2.99k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
1.81k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
0.69k (x0.18)
TOTAL
17.29k
9.97k (x0.58)
Multithread
Q9550
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
11.72k
41k (x3.5)
Test#2 (FP)
24.91k
28.17k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.77k
17.4k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
3.88k (x1.51)
TOTAL
48.98k
90.45k (x1.85)
Performance/W
Q9550
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
123 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
262 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
516 points/W
1131 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q9550
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1375 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
6103 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4