Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Core i7-8750H
Description
The Q9550 is based on Core architecture while the i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the i7-8750H gets 52.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.1 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the i7-8750H gets 52.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.1 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
906ea
Core
Yorkfield
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.833 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.833 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12288 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
9216 kB
Date
March 2008
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
17.29k points
53.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.98k points
231.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Q9550
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
3.01k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
11.68k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
3.78k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.43k
5.64k (x1.27)
TOTAL
16.42k
24.12k (x1.47)
Multithread
Q9550
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.92k
7.4k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
29.99k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.31k
9.66k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
5.12k (x1.52)
TOTAL
48.96k
52.18k (x1.07)
Performance/W
Q9550
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
104 points/W
165 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
267 points/W
667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109 points/W
215 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
515 points/W
1160 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q9550
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
917 points/GHz
734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2356 points/GHz
2850 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
922 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1565 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
TOTAL
5797 points/GHz
5883 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4