Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The Q9550 is based on Core architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.6 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.6 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
100fa0
Core
Yorkfield
Thuban
Base frecuency
2.833 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.833 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
12288 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2008
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.29k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.98k points
80.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Q9550
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
1.98k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
4.57k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
2.57k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.43k
3.51k (x0.79)
TOTAL
16.42k
12.64k (x0.77)
Multithread
Q9550
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.92k
11.86k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
27.4k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.31k
15.39k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
3.46k (x1.03)
TOTAL
48.96k
58.11k (x1.19)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q9550
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.28k
5.17k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
5.33k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
2.76k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
3.51k (x0.9)
TOTAL
17.29k
16.77k (x0.97)
Multithread
Q9550
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.72k
29.82k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
24.91k
30.79k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.77k
15.88k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
3.69k (x1.44)
TOTAL
48.98k
80.19k (x1.64)
Performance/W
Q9550
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
123 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
262 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
516 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q9550
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1375 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
6103 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4