| | | | | | |

Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The Q9550 is based on Core architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 101.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 2.1 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
806c1
Core
Yorkfield
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.833 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.833 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
12288 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2008
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
17.29k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.98k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Q9550
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
3.75k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
17.22k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
9.79k (x3.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.43k
8.21k (x1.85)
TOTAL
16.42k
38.97k (x2.37)

Multithread

Q9550

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.92k
9.19k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
35.47k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.31k
19.14k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
5.82k (x1.73)
TOTAL
48.96k
69.62k (x1.42)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q9550
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.28k
12.9k (x3.93)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
21.4k (x2.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
10.73k (x3.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
8.16k (x2.1)
TOTAL
17.29k
53.19k (x3.08)

Multithread

Q9550

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.72k
30.31k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
24.91k
45.13k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.77k
20.17k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
5.77k (x2.24)
TOTAL
48.98k
101.38k (x2.07)

Performance/W
Q9550
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
123 points/W
1082 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
262 points/W
1612 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103 points/W
720 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
516 points/W
3621 points/W

Performance/GHz
Q9550
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
2616 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1375 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
TOTAL
6103 points/GHz
12974 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4