Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Pentium E6600
Description
Both models Q6700 and E6600 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the E6600 gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E6600 is 1.5 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the E6600 gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E6600 is 1.5 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
1067a
Core
Kentsfield
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.666 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
April 2007
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
10.05k points
16.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
19.77k points
29.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6700
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.06k
3.57k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
7.85k (x2.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
3.14k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.68k
1.58k (x0.94)
TOTAL
10.05k
16.14k (x1.61)
Multithread
Q6700
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
6.99k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
5.83k
14.66k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
6.09k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.53k
1.66k (x1.08)
TOTAL
19.77k
29.4k (x1.49)
Performance/W
Q6700
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
77 points/W
108 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
61 points/W
226 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54 points/W
94 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
26 points/W
TOTAL
208 points/W
452 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6700
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1163 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1029 points/GHz
2561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
962 points/GHz
1023 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/GHz
516 points/GHz
TOTAL
3768 points/GHz
5263 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4