Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Celeron E3300
Description
Both models Q6700 and E3300 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E3300 is 1.2 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E3300 is 1.2 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
1067a
Core
Kentsfield
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.666 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
April 2007
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
10.05k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
19.77k points
24.6k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6700
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
3.06k
2.9k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
6.38k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
2.59k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.68k
1.08k (x0.64)
TOTAL
10.05k
12.94k (x1.29)
Multithread
Q6700
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
5.76k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
5.83k
12.67k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
5.16k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.53k
1.01k (x0.66)
TOTAL
19.77k
24.6k (x1.24)
Performance/W
Q6700
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
77 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
61 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
208 points/W
378 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6700
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1029 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
962 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
3768 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4