Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Pentium Gold 5405U
Description
The Q6600 is based on Core architecture while the 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.6 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.6 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
806eb
Core
Kentsfield
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
2048 kB
Date
July 2007
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
8.92k points
21.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.64k points
48.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6600
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.78k
7.01k (x2.52)
Test#2 (FP)
2.49k
9.51k (x3.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.31k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
2.52k (x1.94)
TOTAL
8.92k
21.34k (x2.39)
Multithread
Q6600
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.9k
16.03k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
24.11k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.11k
5.59k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
3.1k (x3.69)
TOTAL
30.64k
48.83k (x1.59)
Performance/W
Q6600
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
115 points/W
1069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
103 points/W
1607 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
372 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
207 points/W
TOTAL
323 points/W
3255 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6600
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
3046 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
4134 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1004 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
1094 points/GHz
TOTAL
3718 points/GHz
9278 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4