Core 2 Duo T7250 vs P8600
Description
Both models T7250 and P8600 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7250 gets a score of 13.8 k points while the P8600 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the P8600 is 1.5 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7250 gets a score of 13.8 k points while the P8600 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the P8600 is 1.5 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
10676
Core
Merom
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA 479
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2007
July 2008
Mean monothread perf.
7.57k points
12.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.82k points
20.99k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7250
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.27k
2.76k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
2.07k
6.11k (x2.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.3k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
1.25k (x1.02)
TOTAL
7.57k
12.41k (x1.64)
Multithread
T7250
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.51k
4.94k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
4.09k
10.59k (x2.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
4.22k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.32k
1.24k (x0.94)
TOTAL
13.82k
20.99k (x1.52)
Performance/W
T7250
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
198 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
117 points/W
424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111 points/W
169 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
395 points/W
840 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7250
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
1135 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
2545 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/GHz
520 points/GHz
TOTAL
3787 points/GHz
5173 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4