Core 2 Duo T7100 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Description
Both models T7100 and Q6600 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 2.4 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 2.4 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
6fb
Core
Merom
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
May 2007
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
8.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
30.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
2.78k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
2.49k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
2.37k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.29k (x1.04)
TOTAL
7.05k
8.92k (x1.27)
Multithread
T7100
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
10.9k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
9.79k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
9.11k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
0.84k (x0.65)
TOTAL
12.9k
30.64k (x2.37)
Performance/W
T7100
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
115 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
103 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
323 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7100
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4