Core 2 Duo T7100 vs L7500
Description
Both models T7100 and L7500 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the L7500 gets 10.6 k points.
Summarizing, the T7100 is 1.2 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the L7500 gets 10.6 k points.
Summarizing, the T7100 is 1.2 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
6fa
Core
Merom
Merom
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA 479
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2007
October 2006
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
6.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
10.65k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
L7500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
1.83k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
1.65k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
1.58k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.68k (x1.35)
TOTAL
7.05k
6.74k (x0.96)
Multithread
T7100
L7500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
3.38k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
3.03k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
2.89k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
1.34k (x1.05)
TOTAL
12.9k
10.65k (x0.83)
Performance/W
T7100
L7500
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7100
L7500
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
1051 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
4215 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4