| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo T7100 vs E7200


Description
Both models T7100 and E7200 are based on Core architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E7200 is 2 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fd
10676
Core
Merom
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.533 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2007
April 2008
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
13.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
25.21k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
2.93k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
6.48k (x3.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
2.6k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.45k (x1.17)
TOTAL
7.05k
13.46k (x1.91)

Multithread

T7100

E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
5.85k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
12.91k (x3.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
5.22k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
1.23k (x0.96)
TOTAL
12.9k
25.21k (x1.95)

Performance/W
T7100
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
199 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
388 points/W

Performance/GHz
T7100
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
574 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
5315 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4