Core 2 Duo T7100 vs Athlon II M300
Description
The T7100 is based on Core architecture while the M300 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the M300 is 1.4 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the M300 is 1.4 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
100f62
Core
Merom
Caspian
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket S1G3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
May 2007
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
17.73k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
2.66k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
3.84k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
1.97k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.1k (x0.88)
TOTAL
7.05k
9.57k (x1.36)
Multithread
T7100
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
5.04k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
7.46k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
3.75k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
1.48k (x1.15)
TOTAL
12.9k
17.73k (x1.37)
Performance/W
T7100
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
144 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
213 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
506 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7100
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1921 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
550 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
4784 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4