Core 2 Duo T7100 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Description
The T7100 is based on Core architecture while the TK-42 is based on K8.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the TK-42 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the TK-42 is 1 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the TK-42 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the TK-42 is 1 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
60f82
Core
Merom
Tyler
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket S1g1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
20 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
May 2007
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
6.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
12.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
1.06k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
2.91k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
1.43k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
0.89k (x0.71)
TOTAL
7.05k
6.28k (x0.89)
Multithread
T7100
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
4.02k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
5.2k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
2.68k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
1k (x0.78)
TOTAL
12.9k
12.91k (x1)
Performance/W
T7100
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
201 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
645 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7100
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
662 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
555 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
3927 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4