Core 2 Duo T7100 vs A6 9210
Description
The T7100 is based on Core architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 2 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 2 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
670f00
Core
Merom
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
May 2007
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
4.87k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
10.38k (x5.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
2.59k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
2.38k (x1.91)
TOTAL
7.05k
20.22k (x2.87)
Multithread
T7100
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
7.41k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
11.87k (x3.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
3.35k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
2.6k (x2.03)
TOTAL
12.9k
25.23k (x1.96)
Performance/W
T7100
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7100
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4