| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo T6600 vs Xeon E5-4640


Description
The T6600 is based on Core architecture while the E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the E5-4640 gets 581.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 28.2 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
206d7
Core
Penryn-3M
Sandy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
8 /16
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2009
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
11.15k points
13.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.63k points
610.16k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T6600
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
2.01k
1.66k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
5.17k
5.26k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.17k
2.13k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
2.53k (x3.36)
TOTAL
10.1k
11.58k (x1.15)

Multithread

T6600

E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
77.64k (x20.01)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
212.2k (x21.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.17k
113.11k (x27.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
7.54k (x10.9)
TOTAL
18.58k
410.48k (x22.1)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6600
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
6.19k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
5.59k
5.89k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.26k
2.11k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
2.51k (x3.34)
TOTAL
11.15k
16.7k (x1.5)

Multithread

T6600

E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
244.88k (x49.98)
Test#2 (FP)
10.71k
215.35k (x20.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
114.64k (x26.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
6.76k (x9.82)
TOTAL
20.63k
581.63k (x28.2)

Performance/W
T6600
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
306 points/W
2267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
124 points/W
1207 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
589 points/W
6122 points/W

Performance/GHz
T6600
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
2210 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2539 points/GHz
2105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/GHz
895 points/GHz
TOTAL
5068 points/GHz
5966 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4