Core 2 Duo T6600 vs P8600
Description
Both models T6600 and P8600 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the P8600 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the P8600 is 1 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the P8600 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the P8600 is 1 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
10676
Core
Penryn-3M
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA 479
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
3072 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
January 2009
July 2008
Mean monothread perf.
11.15k points
12.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.63k points
20.99k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6600
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
2.76k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
5.59k
6.11k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.26k
2.3k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
1.25k (x1.66)
TOTAL
11.15k
12.41k (x1.11)
Multithread
T6600
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
4.94k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
10.71k
10.59k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
4.22k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
1.24k (x1.81)
TOTAL
20.63k
20.99k (x1.02)
Performance/W
T6600
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
198 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
306 points/W
424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
124 points/W
169 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
589 points/W
840 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6600
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2539 points/GHz
2545 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/GHz
520 points/GHz
TOTAL
5068 points/GHz
5173 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4