Core 2 Duo T6600 vs Celeron 4205U
Description
The T6600 is based on Core architecture while the 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4205U is 1.8 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4205U is 1.8 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
806ec
Core
Penryn-3M
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2009
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
11.15k points
20.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.63k points
37.61k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6600
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
6.53k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
5.59k
9.46k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.26k
2.28k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
2.34k (x3.11)
TOTAL
11.15k
20.61k (x1.85)
Multithread
T6600
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
12.97k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
10.71k
18.12k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
4.33k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
2.18k (x3.17)
TOTAL
20.63k
37.61k (x1.82)
Performance/W
T6600
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
865 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
306 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
124 points/W
289 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
146 points/W
TOTAL
589 points/W
2507 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6600
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
3629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2539 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
TOTAL
5068 points/GHz
11451 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4