Core 2 Duo T6400 vs A6 9210
Description
The T6400 is based on Core architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.5 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.5 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
670f00
Core
Penryn-3M
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
January 2009
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
10.08k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.08k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6400
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2.26k
4.87k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
4.98k
10.38k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
2.59k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
2.38k (x2.5)
TOTAL
10.08k
20.22k (x2.01)
Multithread
T6400
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
4.06k
7.41k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
11.87k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.38k
3.35k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.11k
2.6k (x2.34)
TOTAL
17.08k
25.23k (x1.48)
Performance/W
T6400
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
116 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
244 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
488 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6400
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1128 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
478 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
5040 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4