| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo T5800 vs Core i7-720QM


Description
The T5800 is based on Core architecture while the i7-720QM is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T5800 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the i7-720QM gets 38.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-720QM is 3 times faster than the T5800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fd
106e5
Core
Meron
Clarksfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
PGA 478
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2008
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
7.37k points
13.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.91k points
38.78k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T5800
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
1.49k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
1.98k
3.4k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.9k
1.95k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.1k
2.08k (x1.9)
TOTAL
6.95k
8.92k (x1.28)

Multithread

T5800

i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
3.71k
4.23k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
3.71k
11.4k (x3.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.53k
7.17k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.24k
4.51k (x3.63)
TOTAL
12.2k
27.32k (x2.24)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T5800
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
5.49k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
2.05k
3.55k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.96k
2.01k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.07k
2.09k (x1.94)
TOTAL
7.37k
13.13k (x1.78)

Multithread

T5800

i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
4.28k
15.06k (x3.52)
Test#2 (FP)
3.8k
12.15k (x3.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
7.18k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
4.39k (x3.56)
TOTAL
12.91k
38.78k (x3)

Performance/W
T5800
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
122 points/W
335 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
108 points/W
270 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103 points/W
160 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
862 points/W

Performance/GHz
T5800
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
1145 points/GHz
1962 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1023 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
980 points/GHz
717 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
537 points/GHz
745 points/GHz
TOTAL
3684 points/GHz
4691 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4