Core 2 Duo T5800 vs A6 9210
Description
The T5800 is based on Core architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T5800 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 2 times faster than the T5800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T5800 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 2 times faster than the T5800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
670f00
Core
Meron
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
PGA 478
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
October 2008
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
7.37k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.91k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T5800
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
4.87k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
2.05k
10.38k (x5.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.96k
2.59k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.07k
2.38k (x2.22)
TOTAL
7.37k
20.22k (x2.74)
Multithread
T5800
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
4.28k
7.41k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
3.8k
11.87k (x3.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
3.35k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
2.6k (x2.11)
TOTAL
12.91k
25.23k (x1.96)
Performance/W
T5800
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
122 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
108 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
T5800
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1145 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1023 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
980 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
537 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
3684 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4