Core 2 Duo P8400 vs Pentium 4417U
Description
The P8400 is based on Core architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P8400 gets a score of 21 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 2 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P8400 gets a score of 21 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 2 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
806ea
Core
Peryn-3M
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.267 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
July 2008
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
11.38k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
21.02k points
41.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P8400
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.43k
7.94k (x3.27)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
11.35k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.13k
2.39k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
2.8k (x1.96)
TOTAL
11.38k
24.49k (x2.15)
Multithread
P8400
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.81k
13.1k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
10.58k
21.1k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.18k
4.49k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
2.46k (x1.7)
TOTAL
21.02k
41.15k (x1.96)
Performance/W
P8400
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
193 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
423 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
841 points/W
2743 points/W
Performance/GHz
P8400
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
1071 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2383 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
938 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
629 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
5022 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4