Core 2 Duo L7500 vs E6300
Description
Both models L7500 and E6300 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L7500 gets a score of 10.6 k points while the E6300 gets 12 k points.
Summarizing, the E6300 is 1.1 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L7500 gets a score of 10.6 k points while the E6300 gets 12 k points.
Summarizing, the E6300 is 1.1 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fa
6f2
Core
Merom
Conroe
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.866 GHz
Socket
BGA 479
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
17 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2006
July 2006
Mean monothread perf.
6.74k points
6.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.65k points
12.05k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
L7500
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.58k
1.82k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
1.59k
1.83k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.51k
1.86k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
1.24k (x0.73)
TOTAL
6.39k
6.75k (x1.06)
Multithread
L7500
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
3.07k
3.51k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
3.11k
3.59k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.96k
3.49k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.4k
1.29k (x0.92)
TOTAL
10.55k
11.87k (x1.13)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L7500
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.83k
2.09k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
1.65k
1.94k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
1.79k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.68k
1.05k (x0.63)
TOTAL
6.74k
6.87k (x1.02)
Multithread
L7500
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
3.65k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
3.03k
3.76k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.89k
3.61k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
1.03k (x0.77)
TOTAL
10.65k
12.05k (x1.13)
Performance/W
L7500
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
199 points/W
56 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
55 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
185 points/W
Performance/GHz
L7500
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1121 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1051 points/GHz
564 points/GHz
TOTAL
4215 points/GHz
3684 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4