Core 2 Duo L7500 vs SU7300
Description
Both models L7500 and SU7300 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L7500 gets a score of 10.6 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 1.1 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L7500 gets a score of 10.6 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 1.1 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fa
1067a
Core
Merom
Peryn-3M
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 479
BGA 956
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
17 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2006
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.74k points
6.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.65k points
11.27k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L7500
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.83k
1.48k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
1.65k
3.27k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
1.24k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.68k
0.93k (x0.55)
TOTAL
6.74k
6.92k (x1.03)
Multithread
L7500
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
2.54k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
3.03k
5.49k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.89k
2.1k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
1.13k (x0.84)
TOTAL
10.65k
11.27k (x1.06)
Performance/W
L7500
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
199 points/W
254 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
210 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
1127 points/W
Performance/GHz
L7500
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1051 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
TOTAL
4215 points/GHz
5325 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4