Core 2 Duo L7500 vs A6 3600
Description
The L7500 is based on Core architecture while the 3600 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L7500 gets a score of 10.6 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 4.2 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L7500 gets a score of 10.6 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 4.2 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fa
300f10
Core
Merom
Llano
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 479
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
17 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x1024 kB
Date
October 2006
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
6.74k points
12.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.65k points
44.12k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L7500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1.83k
4.03k (x2.2)
Test#2 (FP)
1.65k
4.25k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
2.19k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.68k
1.54k (x0.92)
TOTAL
6.74k
12.01k (x1.78)
Multithread
L7500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
15.66k (x4.63)
Test#2 (FP)
3.03k
16.66k (x5.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.89k
8.33k (x2.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
3.48k (x2.59)
TOTAL
10.65k
44.12k (x4.14)
Performance/W
L7500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
199 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
256 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
128 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
679 points/W
Performance/GHz
L7500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1770 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1051 points/GHz
642 points/GHz
TOTAL
4215 points/GHz
5006 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4