Core 2 Duo L7500 vs A6 3500
Description
The L7500 is based on Core architecture while the 3500 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L7500 gets a score of 10.6 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 3.1 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L7500 gets a score of 10.6 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 3.1 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fa
300f10
Core
Merom
Llano
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 479
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
2/2
3/3
TDP
17 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
3x64+3x64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
3x1024 kB
Date
October 2006
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
6.74k points
13.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.65k points
32.72k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L7500
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.83k
4.75k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
1.65k
4.72k (x2.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
2.49k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.68k
1.69k (x1)
TOTAL
6.74k
13.65k (x2.02)
Multithread
L7500
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
12.56k (x3.71)
Test#2 (FP)
3.03k
12.58k (x4.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.89k
6.08k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
1.49k (x1.11)
TOTAL
10.65k
32.72k (x3.07)
Performance/W
L7500
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
199 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
93 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
23 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
503 points/W
Performance/GHz
L7500
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1978 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1051 points/GHz
704 points/GHz
TOTAL
4215 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4