Core 2 Duo L7500 vs A4 3310MX
Description
The L7500 is based on Core architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L7500 gets a score of 10.6 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.6 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L7500 gets a score of 10.6 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.6 times faster than the L7500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fa
300f10
Core
Merom
Llano
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 479
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
17 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
October 2006
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
6.74k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.65k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L7500
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1.83k
3.98k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
1.65k
4k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
2.05k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.68k
1.37k (x0.81)
TOTAL
6.74k
11.4k (x1.69)
Multithread
L7500
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
5.74k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
3.03k
6.05k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.89k
2.85k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
1.86k (x1.39)
TOTAL
10.65k
16.5k (x1.55)
Performance/W
L7500
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
199 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
L7500
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1051 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
4215 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4