Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Xeon W3530
Description
The E8400 is based on Core architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8400 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 2.7 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8400 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 2.7 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
106a5
Core
Wolfdale
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2008
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.28k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.11k points
72.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8400
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
7.51k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
4.93k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
3.02k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
2.74k (x0.71)
TOTAL
17.28k
18.2k (x1.05)
Multithread
E8400
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
6.3k
31.33k (x4.97)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
23.11k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.32k
15.78k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2.55k (x1.44)
TOTAL
27.11k
72.77k (x2.68)
Performance/W
E8400
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
97 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
211 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
417 points/W
560 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8400
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1099 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2426 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1278 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
5762 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4