Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium Gold 5405U
Description
The E8400 is based on Core architecture while the 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8400 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.8 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8400 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.8 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
806eb
Core
Wolfdale
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2008
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.28k points
21.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.11k points
48.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8400
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
7.01k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
9.51k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
2.31k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
2.52k (x0.66)
TOTAL
17.28k
21.34k (x1.23)
Multithread
E8400
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.3k
16.03k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
24.11k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.32k
5.59k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
3.1k (x1.75)
TOTAL
27.11k
48.83k (x1.8)
Performance/W
E8400
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
97 points/W
1069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
211 points/W
1607 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82 points/W
372 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
207 points/W
TOTAL
417 points/W
3255 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8400
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
1099 points/GHz
3046 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2426 points/GHz
4134 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1004 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1278 points/GHz
1094 points/GHz
TOTAL
5762 points/GHz
9278 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4