| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Core i5-6400


Description
The E8400 is based on Core architecture while the i5-6400 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8400 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i5-6400 gets 129.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 4.8 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
506e3
Core
Wolfdale
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2008
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
17.28k points
48.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.11k points
174.05k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E8400
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.47k
3.2k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
12.81k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
4.18k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.47k
4.3k (x0.96)
TOTAL
16.55k
24.49k (x1.48)

Multithread

E8400

i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.64k
11.45k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
12.36k
46.67k (x3.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
14.69k (x3.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.96k
5.92k (x3.02)
TOTAL
23.82k
78.73k (x3.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8400
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
11.56k (x3.51)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
16.53k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
4.3k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.97k (x1.04)
TOTAL
17.28k
36.36k (x2.1)

Multithread

E8400

i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
6.3k
43.01k (x6.83)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
64.46k (x4.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.32k
16.14k (x3.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
5.91k (x3.32)
TOTAL
27.11k
129.51k (x4.78)

Performance/W
E8400
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
97 points/W
662 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
211 points/W
992 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82 points/W
248 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
417 points/W
1992 points/W

Performance/GHz
E8400
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
1099 points/GHz
3503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2426 points/GHz
5009 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1278 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
TOTAL
5762 points/GHz
11018 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4