Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Celeron N5105
Description
The E8400 is based on Core architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8400 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 2.4 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8400 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 2.4 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
906c0
Core
Wolfdale
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2008
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
17.28k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.11k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8400
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
9.83k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
9.74k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
3.65k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.88k (x1.01)
TOTAL
17.28k
27.1k (x1.57)
Multithread
E8400
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
6.3k
25.04k (x3.97)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
24.7k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.32k
9.29k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
5.06k (x2.85)
TOTAL
27.11k
64.09k (x2.36)
Performance/W
E8400
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
97 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
211 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
417 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8400
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1099 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2426 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1278 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
5762 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4