| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The E8400 is based on Core architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8400 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500U is 5.5 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
810f81
Core
Wolfdale
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2008
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.28k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.11k points
140.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E8400
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.47k
3.24k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
13.16k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
4.41k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.47k
3.32k (x0.74)
TOTAL
16.55k
24.12k (x1.46)

Multithread

E8400

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.64k
12.95k (x2.79)
Test#2 (FP)
12.36k
57.84k (x4.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
21.05k (x4.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.96k
3.51k (x1.79)
TOTAL
23.82k
95.36k (x4)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8400
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
11.98k (x3.63)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
15.85k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
4.53k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.29k (x0.86)
TOTAL
17.28k
35.65k (x2.06)

Multithread

E8400

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.3k
48.28k (x7.66)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
74.19k (x5.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.32k
23.29k (x4.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
3.47k (x1.95)
TOTAL
27.11k
149.23k (x5.51)

Performance/W
E8400
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
97 points/W
3219 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
211 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82 points/W
1553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
231 points/W
TOTAL
417 points/W
9949 points/W

Performance/GHz
E8400
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1099 points/GHz
3238 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2426 points/GHz
4283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1224 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1278 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
TOTAL
5762 points/GHz
9634 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4