Core 2 Duo E8200 vs ARM M1
Description
The E8200 is based on Core architecture while the M1 is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the M1 gets 142.3 k points.
Summarizing, the M1 is 5.6 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the M1 gets 142.3 k points.
Summarizing, the M1 is 5.6 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
f4a
Core
Wolfdale
-
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
-
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
- kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
- kB
Cache L3
0 kB
- kB
Date
January 2008
January 1900
Mean monothread perf.
15.77k points
41.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.39k points
142.32k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8200
M1
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
9.46k (x3.16)
Test#2 (FP)
6.62k
24.42k (x3.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
3.76k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
3.8k (x1.06)
TOTAL
15.77k
41.44k (x2.63)
Multithread
E8200
M1
Test#1 (Integers)
5.83k
34.73k (x5.96)
Test#2 (FP)
12.64k
87.52k (x6.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
13.74k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.95k
6.34k (x3.26)
TOTAL
25.39k
142.32k (x5.61)
Performance/W
E8200
M1
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W