Core 2 Duo E8200 vs Core i3-6100U
Description
The E8200 is based on Core architecture while the i3-6100U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the i3-6100U gets 50.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100U is 2 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the i3-6100U gets 50.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100U is 2 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
406e3
Core
Wolfdale
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2008
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
15.77k points
30.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.39k points
69.94k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8200
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
7.99k (x2.66)
Test#2 (FP)
6.62k
11.82k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.97k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
3.75k (x1.04)
TOTAL
15.77k
26.52k (x1.68)
Multithread
E8200
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.83k
15.44k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
12.64k
23.79k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
6.93k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.95k
4.03k (x2.07)
TOTAL
25.39k
50.19k (x1.98)
Performance/W
E8200
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
1029 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
1586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
391 points/W
3346 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8200
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
1124 points/GHz
3474 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2481 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1349 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
TOTAL
5912 points/GHz
11532 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4