Core 2 Duo E8200 vs Celeron N5100
Description
The E8200 is based on Core architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 3.5 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8200 gets a score of 25.4 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 3.5 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
906c0
Core
Wolfdale
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2008
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
15.77k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.39k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8200
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
9.74k (x3.25)
Test#2 (FP)
6.62k
9.84k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
3.89k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
3.51k (x0.98)
TOTAL
15.77k
26.98k (x1.71)
Multithread
E8200
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
5.83k
34.19k (x5.87)
Test#2 (FP)
12.64k
36.28k (x2.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.97k
15.3k (x3.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.95k
4.05k (x2.08)
TOTAL
25.39k
89.82k (x3.54)
Performance/W
E8200
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
391 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8200
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
1124 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2481 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1349 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
5912 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4