Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The E7400 is based on Core architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7400 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 141.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.6 times faster than the E7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7400 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 141.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.6 times faster than the E7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
50657
Core
Wolfdale
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
11264 kB
Date
October 2008
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
14.31k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.71k points
311.57k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E7400
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2.54k
2.59k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
6.56k
9.5k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.73k
3.15k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.83k
5.9k (x3.22)
TOTAL
13.66k
21.13k (x1.55)
Multithread
E7400
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
5.08k
21.09k (x4.16)
Test#2 (FP)
13.07k
80.93k (x6.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
30.76k (x5.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.62k
8.51k (x5.24)
TOTAL
25.29k
141.3k (x5.59)
Performance/W
E7400
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
78 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
201 points/W
952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85 points/W
362 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
389 points/W
1662 points/W
Performance/GHz
E7400
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
906 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2344 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
654 points/GHz
1843 points/GHz
TOTAL
4879 points/GHz
6604 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4