Core 2 Duo E7200 vs P8600
Description
Both models E7200 and P8600 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7200 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the P8600 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the E7200 is 1.2 times faster than the P8600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7200 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the P8600 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the E7200 is 1.2 times faster than the P8600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
10676
Core
Wolfdale
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 479
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2008
July 2008
Mean monothread perf.
13.46k points
12.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.21k points
20.99k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E7200
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.93k
2.76k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
6.48k
6.11k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.6k
2.3k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
1.25k (x0.86)
TOTAL
13.46k
12.41k (x0.92)
Multithread
E7200
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.85k
4.94k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
12.91k
10.59k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.22k
4.22k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
1.24k (x1.01)
TOTAL
25.21k
20.99k (x0.83)
Performance/W
E7200
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
198 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
199 points/W
424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
169 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
388 points/W
840 points/W
Performance/GHz
E7200
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2558 points/GHz
2545 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
574 points/GHz
520 points/GHz
TOTAL
5315 points/GHz
5173 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4