Core 2 Duo E7200 vs Core i3-3110M
Description
The E7200 is based on Core architecture while the i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7200 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.5 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E7200 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.5 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
306a9
Core
Wolfdale
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2008
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
13.46k points
17.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.21k points
33.81k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E7200
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.93k
6.66k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
6.48k
6.88k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.6k
2.68k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
2.6k (x1.79)
TOTAL
13.46k
18.83k (x1.4)
Multithread
E7200
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.85k
16.56k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
12.91k
11.7k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.22k
7.28k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
2.25k (x1.83)
TOTAL
25.21k
37.78k (x1.5)
Performance/W
E7200
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
90 points/W
473 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
199 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
19 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
388 points/W
1080 points/W
Performance/GHz
E7200
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
2776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2558 points/GHz
2868 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
1118 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
574 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
5315 points/GHz
7847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4