Core 2 Duo E4400 vs A4 3310MX
Description
The E4400 is based on Core architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E4400 gets a score of 14.2 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.2 times faster than the E4400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E4400 gets a score of 14.2 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.2 times faster than the E4400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
300f10
Core
Allendale
Llano
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
July 2007
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
7.67k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.17k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E4400
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
3.98k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
2.09k
4k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.05k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.18k
1.37k (x1.16)
TOTAL
7.67k
11.4k (x1.49)
Multithread
E4400
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
4.61k
5.74k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
4.17k
6.05k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.2k
2.85k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
1.86k (x1.56)
TOTAL
14.17k
16.5k (x1.16)
Performance/W
E4400
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
71 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
64 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
218 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
E4400
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1151 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1044 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
591 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
3834 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4