Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The E6600 is based on Core architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 15.9 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 6.5 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 15.9 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 6.5 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f6
50657
Core
Conroe
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
11264 kB
Date
July 2006
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
9.99k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.12k points
216.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6600
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2.38k
1.97k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
2.39k
8.15k (x3.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
2.37k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
4.84k (x1.74)
TOTAL
9.95k
17.32k (x1.74)
Multithread
E6600
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
15.73k (x3.36)
Test#2 (FP)
4.68k
64.78k (x13.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
18.06k (x3.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
5.21k (x2.89)
TOTAL
15.86k
103.77k (x6.54)
Performance/W
E6600
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
72 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
72 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
28 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
244 points/W
1221 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6600
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
993 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
994 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
996 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
4144 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4