Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The E6600 is based on Core architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 15.9 k points while the i5-5200U gets 32.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 2.1 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 15.9 k points while the i5-5200U gets 32.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 2.1 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f6
306d4
Core
Conroe
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2006
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
9.99k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.12k points
68.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E6600
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.38k
2.67k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
2.39k
9.37k (x3.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
3.13k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.59k (x0.93)
TOTAL
9.95k
17.76k (x1.79)
Multithread
E6600
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
4.16k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
4.68k
19.01k (x4.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
6.48k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
2.96k (x1.64)
TOTAL
15.86k
32.61k (x2.06)
Performance/W
E6600
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
72 points/W
277 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
72 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72 points/W
432 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
28 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
244 points/W
2174 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6600
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
993 points/GHz
988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
994 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
996 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
TOTAL
4144 points/GHz
6577 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4