Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Celeron N5095
Description
The E6600 is based on Core architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 16.1 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 5.8 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 16.1 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 5.8 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f6
906c0
Core
Conroe
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2006
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
9.99k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.12k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6600
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
2.7k
10.08k (x3.73)
Test#2 (FP)
2.42k
10.11k (x4.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.41k
4.06k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
2.36k (x0.96)
TOTAL
9.99k
26.6k (x2.66)
Multithread
E6600
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
5.19k
36.86k (x7.11)
Test#2 (FP)
4.55k
38.51k (x8.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
15.17k (x3.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2.72k (x1.53)
TOTAL
16.12k
93.26k (x5.79)
Performance/W
E6600
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
80 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
70 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
71 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
248 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6600
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
1125 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1009 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1025 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
4164 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4