Core 2 Duo E6300 vs SU7300
Description
Both models E6300 and SU7300 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6300 gets a score of 12 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E6300 is 1.1 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6300 gets a score of 12 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E6300 is 1.1 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f2
1067a
Core
Conroe
Peryn-3M
Base frecuency
1.866 GHz
1.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 956
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2006
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.87k points
6.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.05k points
11.27k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6300
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.09k
1.48k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
3.27k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.79k
1.24k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
0.93k (x0.88)
TOTAL
6.87k
6.92k (x1.01)
Multithread
E6300
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
3.65k
2.54k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
3.76k
5.49k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.61k
2.1k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.03k
1.13k (x1.1)
TOTAL
12.05k
11.27k (x0.94)
Performance/W
E6300
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
56 points/W
254 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
58 points/W
549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55 points/W
210 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
185 points/W
1127 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6300
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
1121 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1038 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
961 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
564 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
TOTAL
3684 points/GHz
5325 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4